Is The Public Ready To Wretch Regarding OJ Simpson?

O.J. Simpson was acquitted by a Jury of absolute Morons...none earning more than $28 to $32 K per year and they called "that" motley crew a jury of his peers! None had a university level degree and when interviewed individually some of them could not even answer in complete sentences!





Yet his civil trial where he WAS judged by a jury of his up-scale Brentwood peers found him GUILTY ...





Now he has a book out on "how he 'would have' killed his wife and her friend" and they are being scooped up like Hot Cakes...





Martha Stewart ? ... is small potatoes next to that demon!





And the only media company that slammed him was FOX News !!!





Crime is rewarded it seems with fame and $$$,$$$,$$$ so wake up take a look around and go back to sleep ... or make some noise when you see the Main-Stream Liberal Left Wing "Social-Progressive" Press and media shamefully supporting the dregs of humanity... such as OJ Simpson.





Whay say you?

Is The Public Ready To Wretch Regarding OJ Simpson?
I will not spend my money on his book and I would not read it if it were free.He lost in court so any money he makes should be taken right up front.I am proud of Fox and I will boycott his publishers.
Reply:Unfortunate crime but as a person found innocent by a jury he's not barred from writing this theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. Attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.


A few things that the jury may have considered:


-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.


- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.


- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.


- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..


- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.


- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.


- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.


- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.


Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
Reply:First, it is my opinion OJ "did it" ... and if I'd been on the jury, I would not have acquitted.





That being said .... the amount of money someone earns is not necessarily equivalent to their intelligence. Also, a university degree does not teach common sense. (Those are arrogant and snobbish statements.)





My point is, it should not have taken a rocket scientist or university professor on the jury to convict OJ. The education of the jurors had nothing to do with their lack of common sense. Most of them were (a) starstruck, (b) didn't *want* to believe he did it, and (c) they were cowards. (Cowards without common sense.)





Yeah, he's a demon alright ... but I heard he's not getting any of the money from the book. (I may have misunderstood that part, however.) You say Fox slammed him ... well they were the ones that scheduled his 2 part interview, and after pressure from public outcry they canceled it. Don't give *them* any props!





You want to know what else? I think a huge portion of the people who were horrified with the murder will be some of the ones "scooping the book up like hotcakes" !! Much the way motorists will slow down to look at a grisly accident on the highway. Human nature is ghoulish!





That's what say I.

invisalign